Talk:Academic specialization

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Academic specialization article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[American and British English spelling differences#-ise.2C_-ize_.28-isation.nffe2C_-ization.29|'''specialisation''']]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

This Article is poorly written

This article is very poorly written, and it could and should be greatly expanded. This topic is so important within the world of academia, and it deserves more attention. It is a stub that is at start quality.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:7500:15C0:CCD0:BEB2:E142:EADA (talk) 04:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Foundations of Education

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2022 and 17 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Keithrlee13 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Kara0719.

Requesting an edit

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Scholars have found significant scientific rewards to specialization in academic research in the biomedical context, with papers of more specialized scientists being cited more than those of less specialized scientists.^[1] ^[2] AM13prime (talk) 10:06, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done What is your rationale for these changes? Additionally, these appear to be primary sources. Please review WP:SECONDARY and specifically for biomedical sciences, Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)#Respect_secondary_sources. Spencer^T•C 22:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ de Rassenfosse, Gaétan; Higham, Kyle; Penner, Orion (2022). "Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent". BMC Biology.
^ Abramo, Giovanni; D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea; Di Costa, Flavia (2019). "Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: Which strategy pays off?".

Proposed merge of Specialization of knowledge into Academic specialization

Specialization of knowledge is a two-sentence stub and my quick look at Pages that link to "Specialization of knowledge" suggests that these could just as well link to Academic specialization if the link is not redundant. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email · global) 03:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by The Anome, thanks! — ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email · global) 05:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Rassenfosse, Gaétan; Higham, Kyle; Penner, Orion (2022). "Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent". BMC Biology.

[2] Abramo, Giovanni; D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea; Di Costa, Flavia (2019). "Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: Which strategy pays off?".

[1]

[2]