Talk:Arabica

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

On 21 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Arabica (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 21 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 12:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arabica → Arabica (disambiguation) – The vast majority of readers looking for "Arabica" are looking for Coffea arabica, as Wikinav shows, so proposing this be made a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. "Arabica" in everyday language means the coffee variety. The other items are niche topics. Slowking Man (talk) 08:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 10:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clickstream monthly data compared to monthly views indicate the pattern is: December 153 / 288 = ~53%, November 189 / 314 ~60%, October 90 / 178 = ~50%, September 118 / 247 = ~48%, August 151 / 292 = ~52%. It is the first link in the list, so I'm not sure this is a clear primary topic because roughly half the readers still consistently don't click the most prominent item. A primary redirect might still be a safe experiment, and we can check if it affected reader behavior afterwards. --Joy (talk) 14:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Too broad term, and with different connotations in other languages, to be related to a sub-variety of coffee. There is no relevance to establish as a primary topic. Svartner (talk) 01:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Clear primary redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Svartner. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 16:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not the primary topic by long-term significance or even (as per evidence above) particuarlly by common usage. — Amakuru (talk) 12:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.