Talk:Ashley River

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ashley River (South Carolina). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120419163520/http://www.dnr.sc.gov/water/envaff/river/scenic/ashley.html to http://www.dnr.sc.gov/water/envaff/river/scenic/ashley.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 January 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley River (South Carolina) → Ashley River – Clear primary topic based on page views. The only other river with a similar name is at Ashley River / Rakahuri and as such there is no need for disambiguation in this instance. All other "Ashley River" pages (Ashley River Railroad, Ashley River Historic District and so on) relate to this river and not the one in New Zealand. I note that there is a disambiguation page currently at the proposed title, but as there are just two rivers this could probably be deleted. If we want to keep it (potentially adding the aforementioned other pages?) this should instead change to Ashley River (disambiguation) Turnagra (talk) 20:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Link to page views tool with these added is here - I couldn't seem to add it to the original proposal without messing up the template formatting. Turnagra (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Recent news results show three results for the river in NZ, and fifteen for the river in SC. I will note that to use the page views tool without messing up the template formatting, you need to click the "permalink" button and use the link it gives you. BilledMammal (talk) 02:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. In my opinion, the best approach is to delete the disambiguation page and just use a hatnote to link between the two articles. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As one of the two rivers that meet in Charleston to form the Atlantic Ocean, this is clearly the primary topic; also nb WP:1OTHERPRIMARY. Delete the dab page and use hatnotes per WP:ONEOTHER. — AjaxSmack 00:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.