Talk:Baffles (submarine)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Military history: Maritime Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Jargon

Is "ownship" common submarine jargon? (I can't find it in 1. the dictionary 2. wikipedia or 3. google) I understand what it means from context, but it might be beneficial to explain the meaning of the word, or to re-write it using more conventional terminology. --203.6.205.22 22:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I am proposing that Crazy Ivan be merged into Baffles (submarine). As the articles currently stand, both describe almost the same subject: Baffles describes what it is, then how to clear them; Crazy Ivan describes what baffles are, then the slightly more extreme baffle-clearing manoeuvre stereotypically attributed to one ethnic group, followed by a bunch of pop-culture trivia. I think that they could easily be merged together, with most of the Crazy Ivan-specific content moved into a "Clearing the baffles" section. -- saberwyn 08:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger would be perfect

I agree wholeheartedly. The 2 articles are made for each other. Besides, one could still be directed from a search to the sub paragraph of the Crazy Ivan section, as is already being done in many other articles.

Might i suggest keeping the article as "Baffles" and sub paragraphing the Crazy Ivan thing.

Outofthewoods (talk) 22:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Done

It appears that the merger discussed above has been done. "Crazy Ivan" is now a re-direct to Baffles.

It would have been good practice for this to have been noted here! --220.101.28.25 (talk) 10:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency on the Tautog-collision

This article states that the Tautog-collision of 1970 was caused by the Tautog doing a "Angles and Dangles" moves, while the article on USS_Tautog_(SSN-639) itself says the collision was caused by the K-108 performing a Crazy Ivan. Since the only sources I've found on the collision seems to indicate that it was in fact a Crazy Ivan that caused the collision, I'm removing the relevant sentences from this article. KristianLyngstol (talk) 01:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you use those sources to add the information back into the article as an example of why a Crazy Ivan was so dangerous? -- saberwyn 01:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The final sentence isn't true

The final sentence states that the introduction of towed array sonar has made clearing the baffles unecessary. This isn't true. It has reduced the need, certainly, but there still exists a sizeable area (around 100m shortstay to 600m longstay) between the towed array and the submarine in which the combination of an endfire beam and submarine self noise makes detection of another submarine very improbable. --Munchingfoo (talk) 10:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rephrased. -- saberwyn 08:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of the Maneuvers

The article is written as if the Crazy Ivan and Angles and Dangles moves are both designed to detect if anyone is in the baffles, but then both times Angles and Dangles is mentioned, it says the purpose is to determine how much noise one's own sub is making, rather than to detect if another sub is making any previously undetectable noise. Statalyzer (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed the relevant section and added subsection headings to hopefully help clear this up. The lack of referencing in the article is also an issue, and any improvements to that should lead to increased clarity of information. -- saberwyn 11:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The problem I mentioned is still there. I'd just fix it myself but I'm not 100% sure what the correct answer is. Statalyzer (talk) 07:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an origin to the term "Crazy Ivan"? It's been used in a lot of places, including sci-fi shows such as Firefly and Andromeda, but their notes on the origins of the terms don't quite line-up; one suggestion is that it was a term coined by Tom Clancy's Hunt for the Red October, using the derogatory name "Ivan" for russians, which suggests the manoeuvre must have a more official name. Anyway, I think it could do with some elaboration if anyone knows any more details? Haravikk (talk) 11:19, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Baffles (submarine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20160102073222/http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/military/kursk/kursk.htm to http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/military/kursk/kursk.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

On the linked Chicago Tribune article, the link is outdated - I found this one works (https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1997-07-23-9707230242-story.html). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6017:113:849F:4BB6:F312:FAA4 (talk) 04:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]