Talk:Bare-tailed woolly opossum/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 17:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Funny, I added a Flickr photo to this article years ago, that's how I noticed you had nominated it... Seems you're going into new directions with the latest nominations? FunkMonk (talk) 17:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That dumb Legobot takes ages to let me know who takes up reviews! Funny I came to know you had grabbed this when I saw your contribs. Smaller mammals seems to be a pitiably neglected field, and the countless stubs can be easily improved. So I try to create GAs from this field as well, a bit change as well.Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps add this illustration?[1] The photos are a bit obscured...

OK, let's add this as a new image. I couldn't find this just then... Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"In another similar revision, the bushy-tailed opossum was placed in its own subfamily, Glironiinae" You mention the year of other revisions, why not this one?

Done.

What is the difference between the subspecies? I see there is some clinal differences mentioned.

I'm afraid not, very little info on these opossums (yet this is one of the best known of them!)

Does it have a Prehensile tail? If so, link?

Yeah, missed it.

Perhaps give a brief overview of the evolution of opposums? The fact that it is a marsupial could be stressed.

I have not researched on that yet, opossums are a quite large order. I will spam bits on species articles when I finally work on the Opossum article, it would be easier to understand once I understand the species. Said "in the marsupial order Didelphimorphia".

No more to add!

This must be the shortest review I have had from you! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 08:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pretty short article as well... I guess it is easy to be comprehensive, when little has been written about the subject! Anyway, I'll now pass it. FunkMonk (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]