Talk:Billionaire Boys Club (clothing retailer)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The following websites are relavent to the article, but are constantly removed. Please feel free to add further links.

BBC & BAPE resource

Chaz 14:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the benefit they add to the article? -Will Beback · † · 18:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The website above is relevant to the article, which should already be enough of a reason to be included. Much of the information within this article actually originated from the website I posted above, and not from their official site. The website I posted also provides more information and caters for issues that are not covered here.

Chaz 21:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be a commercial enterprise. Again, what specific information does it have that we cna't put into the article? Since the link is being spread to multiple articles it appears to be spam. -Will Beback · † · 22:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) sue for use of their BBC acronym? Curvebill 21:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was an issue with the use of the acronym and so the logo was changed from an astronaut's head and the letters BBC to the 'arch' logo - Chaz

Fair use rationale for Image:BBclub.png

Image:BBclub.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Portsmouth store. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.247.187 (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]