Talk:Brexit negotiations in 2019

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brexit negotiations in 2019 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Brexit negotiations in 2019 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 19 October 2019.

Wikipedia

European Union

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

European history

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Need to split this article

UK/EU negotiations have finally resumed. Negotiators met on Wednesday 28/8 and "will continue twice a week".^[1]

But here's the problem: the article as it stands is about gyrations and machinations in Parliament and the Conservative Party, not about negotiations. It seems to me that a new home needs to be found for all that stuff - it is valuable but in the wrong article. (a) Do others agree? And (b) If so, what should we call that article? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 08:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Time to step up tempo of Brexit talks, says bullish Boris Johnson".

"EU offers compromise response to Johnson plan"

If anybody wants to write up https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/brexit/boris-johnson-eu-time-limited-backstop-stormont-veto-sinn-fein-dup-649520 after details emerge from more reliable sources, then the relevant wiki article to reference is Cross-community vote, that's the one that requires a double majority. The report is a bit tabloidish, I can't see the Irish government explicitly naming Sinn Féin even though that would be the effect today. --Red King (talk) 12:46, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

new item

new article created, 2019 in United Kingdom politics and government. I know it's pretty late for this year, but this might be useful for items in 2020. --Sm8900 (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Essential information missing between 19/10 and 22/10

I have just noticed but don't have time to research, but we have nothing about the Johnson/Varadkar meeting or the subsequent negotiation that produced the revised WA that went on to be the final W Act. Can someone else fill in, please? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Time to step up tempo of Brexit talks, says bullish Boris Johnson".

[1]