Jump to content

Talk:Caltech–MIT rivalry/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Keilana (talk · contribs) 22:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start reviewing very soon. Keilana|Parlez ici 22:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think this is pretty close but I have a few comments before we get there.

  • In the first section, you mention "RFs", is that an acronym? I checked the source and it didn't clarify.
    • I'd had some trouble finding a reliable source for that, but I found one and added the information.
  • The first paragraph about MIT in "The schools" is choppy.
    • Fixed.
  • I'm personally not a huge fan of bulleted lists in articles, if there's a way you could prosify the list of pranks I think it would be better for the reader. I'm open to both, just wanted to bring it up.
    • Being that there are five independent sets of pranks, I felt that this format is easier for the reader to follow.
  • Is there a source for the Campus Preview Weekend section that is not affiliated with either school?
    • The cannon heist got much more press coverage, some of which mentions the earlier pranks in passing, such as this article. I haven't found any standalone articles about it.
  • Why is Ride of the Valkyries forbidden at Caltech?
    • Info added.
  • The second paragraph on the Fleming cannon has a duplicate citation; it just needs the one at the end of the paragraph, I think.
    • Yeah, whoever reviewed this for DYK made me put it there. :-)
  • I spot-checked for close paraphrasing and it looked fine.

That's all I have for now, you did a great job on this article. Best, Keilana|Parlez ici 14:06, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments above, everything should be fixed. Antony–22 (talkcontribs) 04:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry it took me so long to take a second look! It looks good and I'm going to go ahead and pass it. Great work. Keilana|Parlez ici 13:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]