Jump to content

Talk:Carcinus maenas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Good articleCarcinus maenas has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 10, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 13, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Untitled

We propose to add a section titled "Non Indigenous Range" and to add information to the "Ecology" and "C. maenas as an invasive species" section.--PBG250 00:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


I have a question: In areas where they are particularly bad, why has nobody thought to try to fish them as food (soft shelled?) They may not be very big, but as they are indeed reproducing like rabbits I think a large pot full of them could compensate....


Reference 6

The reference doesn't match up to the link... (Sorry if this isn't the right way to post this!) PJFraser (talk) 16:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out – now fixed! --Stemonitis (talk) 16:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Carcinus maenas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Carcinus maenas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The picture

Is it just me or is it missing a leg? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.232.26 (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]