Jump to content

Talk:Carre's Grammar School/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 14:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This looks great. Will review. The article is exceptionally well-written, and do well even at FAC. I have only a few comments. Sainsf <^>Talk all words 14:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Could we add the precise date when the school was founded to the Lead?
  • Done.
  • Who was Robert Carre? His profession?
  • He didn't have a profession per se, but was a member of the gentry. I've linked to the Carr baronets page; he was linked to them, and I hope to do a lot of work on that page at some point.
  • Who was Robert Cammock?
  • Another local gentleman.
  • £4 per annum Italics not needed
  • Removed.
  • Boys usually take nine or ten subjects... (Key Stages 3 and 4) What about the girls?
  • Girls don't enter the school until Sixth Form, which is Key Stage 5.
  • Why say " c. 1963 " and not simply 1963? (Extra-curricular activities)
  • Because it is not clear that change happened in 1963; I don't have the book to hand, but the implication was that it closed down in the school year 1962-63 I think.
  • I think "Old Carresians" could be renamed as "Alumni". Just an idea.
  • I've changed it to "notable former pupils".

Nooooo! The school's ex-pupils are known as "old Carrensians" both among themselves and by the school. The school annual magazine was, in my day, called "The Carrensian". Cliff (talk) 11:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Noswall59: Would you please respond to this comment? Sainsf <^>Feel at home 11:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CWB001:, @Sainsf: Hi, I have added a note in the infobox that past pupils are called "Old Carrensians". There isn't any clear precedent to follow here, but I see that The Judd School, an FA, uses Sainsf's suggestion, which may be easier for unfamiliar readers to understand. I am not wholly opposed to changing it, but I don't believe it's a major issue and the current formulation is entirely accurate. Cheers, --Noswall59 (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  • Link indenture (History); French, German, Latin, Greek (Curriculum); GCSE (Key Stages 3 and 4)
  • Done.
  • Duplinks: Kesteven and Sleaford High School (School structure); Sleaford Joint Sixth Form (Sixth Form); Duke of Edinburgh's Award Scheme (Extra-curricular activities)
  • Removed, although I could not find a link to the Duke of Edinburgh's scheme in the Extra-curricular section.
  • References: Could ref. 47 be properly formatted?
  • Done.
@Sainsf: thank you very much for taking the time to review this—I will address these comments within the next few days. Cheers, —Noswall59 (talk) 00:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]
@Sainsf: thank you again for comments. I believe I have addressed all of them and made the appropriate changes (please see this edit). Cheers, —Noswall59 (talk) 13:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

I must thank you for all your thanks and cooperation! I am satisfied with your replies. The article satisfies all the GA criteria and is a quite well-written, well-sourced, pleasant read. I would be happy to promote this article. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Talk all words 15:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]