Talk:Carriacou and Petite Martinique

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Grenada High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Grenada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Grenada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GrenadaWikipedia:WikiProject GrenadaTemplate:WikiProject GrenadaGrenada
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands

A note

Kariakoo is now part of Dar es Salaam, the capital of Tanzania. In earlier centuries it was a village, from where slaves were forced to go overseas, as from thousands of other African villages. Kariakoo is mentioned in Ebony, the great book by Ryszard Kapuscinski on Africa and his experiences there. See for example: http://www.takimsholidays.com/coast/daressalaam.asp

Is there a historic relationship between these two places, that would explain their similar names? Were slaves from Kariakoo shipped to Carriacou, giving the island the name of their home village?

An interesting hypothesis. If you want to include it in the articles Carriacou and Kariakoo you are going to have to find an authority on the subject who believes that there is a connection between the two names. Wikipedia is not a venue to display original research or theories, except on your user page of course.

-JCarriker 23:48, May 21, 2004 (UTC)

There is no relationship between Kariakoo and Carriacou, even though the name suggests so. The first settlers, the Amerindians appropriately referred to Carriacou as the 'Land of Reefs'. For a deeper historic explanation check the following page : http://www.paradise-inn-carriacou.com/carriacou_history.php

Merge proposal

There are huge overlapping between these rwo articles: Carriacou and Carriacou and Petite Martinique. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support Carriacou and Petite Martinique forms a single dependency of Grenada, as set out in The Grenada Constitution Order 1973, which states "There shall be a Council for Carriacou and Petit Martinique, which shall be the principal organ of local government in those islands." (It appears that since then Petit Martinique has become more commonly known as Petite Martinique). There may well be a case for individual articles for the two islands at some time in the future, but there doesn't appear to be enough material at present. Even if individual articles were to become needed, there would still be a requirement for the article at Carriacou and Petite Martinique, as that is the legal entity. Skinsmoke (talk) 14:07, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Someone suggested merging Petite Martinique to Carriacou and Petite Martinique as well. I've directed that discussion here because it seems the same arguments apply for both islands. Jafeluv (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The islands need their own page because to learn one island and look a other profile of islands on wikipedia (Kylekieran (talk) 08:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Carried over from merge discussion at Carriacou Skinsmoke (talk) 03:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, merge completed. Cheers, thanks for cleaning up some loose ends. --Nick Penguin_(contribs) 04:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I dont i to a person delete the article the island we should vote do we want to keep the article or delete the article. and i dont like to been delete because two hear diffient. (Kylekieran (talk) 21:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Population & area figures

"With its 586 acres (2.37 km2) and population of 900, it is smaller than Carriacou. Petite Martinique is much smaller, comprising about 9.8% of the total area and 30% of the entire population which is estimated at 10,000."

This would put PM's population at 3,000, not 900. Also, earlier in the article, it says Carriacou's population (in 1991 - is there no more recent estimate?) is around 4,500.

The area given for Carriacou Island (alone) is 34 km2. Petite Martinique's area is given as 2.37km2. 2.37 is approximately 6.5% of the total area, not 9.8% as stated in the article.

In short, somebody has seriously messed up with these figures. 92.15.204.69 (talk) 04:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I found a good reference at Grenada's government homepage. Interestingly enough they referred to this page, which also has an updated population figure. I nevertheless went with the first source's older data since the validity of the governmental site is much more evident than that of the latter site. -- Lejman (talk) 15:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carriacou and Petite Martinique. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Steele

What happened to the Steele reference? The link doesn't go anywhere. G. Moore 21:39, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]