Talk:Chaabou

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 February 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

no citations at all

So, no citations at all, and it seems everything from this page is from a single user named "Maxq 2006". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.26.90.194 (talk) 16:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requested

This article is full of baseless speculation with no sources. It reads like the ramblings of an anti-Muslim with little intelligence and knowledge. It should be deleted, as it has no place on an encyclopedia. SOW93 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it mention false information about Islam.--Ashashyou (talk) 23:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AsceticRose, should we pass this article through AfD? --Fauzan^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 13:43, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fauzan, I think, this page should be deleted. A Google search only showed Chaabou to be persons' name, and not what this article claims. In my view, it fails to meet notability , verifiability, reliable sources. Can you arrange for the deletion process? -AsceticRosé 16:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AsceticRose, I have WP:PRODded it. --Fauzan^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 16:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Searching for chaabou goddess does turn up a few things, though. Also one of the cited ref mentions chaabou in a footnote, as I had checked it few months ago. Any way, atleast not notable. --Fauzan^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 16:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it is not clear what was actually being said in that footnote, but it is clear that the provided ref does not actually discuss about the said chaabou. It seems the ref has been misused by the article creator. -AsceticRosé 17:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]