Talk:Chenrezig statue and skywalk

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 27 April 2022 by reviewer Atlantic306 (talk · contribs).

India: Sikkim / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sikkim (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Move to "Chenrezig statue and skywalk"

MPGuy2824, Atlantic306, and Dissoxciate, the current title of "Chenrezig Statue Cum Skywalk" does not conform to MOS:CAPS, since none of the words following "Chenrezig" are designated as a title in any of the sources provided. Furthermore "cum" is not consistent with WP:CRITERIA for naturalness. Therefore, I propose: "Chenrezig statue and skywalk", in keeping with WP:TITLE. Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I agree with the proposition. While editing, I came across a couple references/sources which used the preposition 'cum', thus leading me to employ that in the article's title. I do think there are inconsistencies with the title, though, and would appreciate it getting changed. It's more apt, natural and perhaps a much more common search term. Cheers! Dissoxciate (talk) 21:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree with above comments Atlantic306 (talk) 22:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done HopsonRoad (talk) 17:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]