Jump to content

Talk:David E. Kelley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


Picture doesn't look like David E. Kelley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_E._Kelley#/media/File:David_Kelley_at_the_62nd_Annual_Peabody_Awards.jpg

Untitled

Can someone confirm that this is really a picture of David E Kelley? Doesn't look like him at all. The main header picture shows how he looks - he has a quite characteristic look that hasn't changed much with time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.239.209.229 (talk) 10:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David E. Kelley's Religion

The recently added paragraph

Sometimes assumed to be a Catholic (because of his surname and his character on The Practice, Bobby Donnell's Catholic background and his personal estrangement from the Church over the issue of pedophile priests), Kelley is actually a Protestant.

merits some scrutiny. If, as The New York Times reported, Kelley was raised Catholic, to what Protestant denomination did he convert and when? And is Bobby Donnell "his character" more so than other Practice characters? Robert Happelberg 20:18, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i don't understand how Kelley is a Catholic last name. 75.45.201.244 (talk) 02:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you are saying here. Even if Kelley is commonly a Catholic name, it doesn't follow that Kelley is. He isn't. The NYT printed a retraction. ∴ Therefore | talk 02:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was being obtuse. You make a good point -- I would think the section should be rewritten so as not to state that. ∴ Therefore | talk 02:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recycled Dialog?

The examples provided of Kelley recycling dialog seem pretty trite. I bet lots of characters say "Hello" to each other on his different shows, too. Is that "recycled dialog" worthy of a place on this list? Or should we just delete this section? --Christofurio 21:13, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I haven't watched many of his shows, but if you ask me using a specific line from one show to the next sounds more like clever writing than "recycling" dialogue, especially based on the examples (save for "Look at me!" which I can see being easy to overuse). But as I haven't actually seen the scenes with these lines. --WWB 00:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alzheimers

In his shows Alzheimers, Dementia, Brain Tumors and alike have been a very important theme. Also assitant sucide or sucide or relatives killing sick members of their family(mostly sons killing their fathers) are a theme. Its very apperent. Somebody should be writing something about that. i don't know if it has something to do with his personal history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.211.161 (talk) 23:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Themes

For the love of god, why does somebody keep removing that he changes facts in his shows? Its fact, god dammit. Are we supposed to believe he is some beacon of fair and true debate? No, his shows have changed facts to make storylines better - live with it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Conanoats (talk • contribs) 12:34, 29 August 2006.

I'm one of those "somebody" editors who is reverting this, and will continue to do so. Please refer to WP:Neutral point of view, which is one of Wikipedia's core policies. Especially read the part on fairness of tone. Your presentation of these alleged "facts" (for which you provide no citation) has overtones of an agenda, so it's not neutral. It's not all about "fact" or "truth". By the way, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. -- PKtm 15:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can I cite a TV show? Maybe Wikipedia should remove all TV show entries since you can't prove any of it? It is all about fact and truth, what else is left? I don't want to read opinions, its true or not and this is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conanoats (talk • contribs) 16:30, 29 August 2006

No, you're contradicting what's presented in the TV show, but you offer no citation of source for the counterfacts that you mention. See WP:Verifiability. In Wikipedia, it's actually not about "truth" per se, it's about verifiability. And even if you did cite sources, you'd need to rewrite your text to be as neutral point of view as possible, because it's a selective presentation of facts obviously intended to paint Kelley as a liar. You need to understand that you have biases here, clearly, which is OK (we all have them, after all), and work to iron those out of any contribution you make to Wikipedia. By the way, again, please sign your talk page entries as I requested. Thanks, PKtm 16:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is probably 7 months too late a comment but, you can cite an episode of a TV show with Template:cite episode. --GracieLizzie 21:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic or protestant

there is the category of roman catholic entreteniers, but in the biograpfy is said that he is a ´prtestant?? so what is he???

I took it off. The category is up for CFD and I'm trying to minimize misuse.--T. Anthony 14:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David E. Kelley's Archetypes

Wikipedia says "The Copyright Infringing Defendant Delusional defendant who thinks he's an icon of copyrighted American folklore, such as a famous comic book superhero or movie character. For example, on The Practice, Lindsay Dole defended a man who thought he was Hannibal Lecter, and kept calling her "Clarice". In another episode, a mental patient thought he was Superman and tried to fly off a hospital ledge."

The episode where a mental patient thought he was Superman was not written by David E. Kelley and he had very little involvement with the show that season except for at the beginning and the end. Also that's only 2 examples of that character, which hardly constitutes an archetype. I think that part should be removed.

Mmm, interesting. I'm sure with only a little effort we can find plenty more examples. Not off the top of my head right now, though. Robert Happelberg 17:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm blanking the whole section as Original Research. Find someone somewhere who's published this stuff and you can re-add it. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 07:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article assessment

I have rated this article as B class because while it is comprehensive there are some sections that lack references (casting and awards). I have rated it as mid importance because of the awards recognition and breadth of his career. I think it's a strong article and compares well to similar featured articles like Aaron Sorkin.

These categories are arbritrary and are subject to review by any editor who feels confident to do so. Please note that a more formal assessment by other editors is required to achieve good article or featured article status. I used criteria from the television wikiproject guidelines here, article about TV series guidelines here and the assessment guidelines here.--Opark 77 12:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Kelley, TV Warrior

Shouldnt a reference to the song "David Kelley, TV Warrior" by DVDA be made somwhere in the article? --Mackay64 (talk) 15:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kelley is "one of the only"...??

There has to be something wrong in the following quoted sentence. It has no sense at all:

"Kelley is one of the only screenwriters to have had a show created by him run on all four of the top commercial U.S. television networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX)".

Besides the logical inconsistency, there should be a better precision about how many screenwriters other than him have achieved this feat. Or state that he is the only one, if there is no other in this category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.19.217.173 (talk) 03:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tropicana straw and music videos?

In this interview, Kristin Hersh of the band Throwing Muses says:

[The video for her song Loon] was shot by one of my dearest friends, David Kelley. Fun fact: he was one of the Painters in Rat Girl [Hersh's 2010 memoir]. He also came up with the straw in the orange for Tropicana. I remember that it was like a day off, which one rarely enjoys on tour. Days off mean you start asking yourself where the hell you are and what the hell you're doing there, but David made it sweet by letting me spend the day with my little toddler, Ryder (Ryder called it "Hamsterdam"). The camera was hidden for most of the entire two day shoot, which was very kind of him.

Does anyone know if this is the same David Kelley? They both have Providence / Boston roots. -- James E. Pace 17:43, 23 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jepace (talk • contribs)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on David E. Kelley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on David E. Kelley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on David E. Kelley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:David E. Kelley/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

=== David E. Kelley === I would like to see this article become good enough for a GA rating and eventually a featured article. Therefore 18:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David E. Kelley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on David E. Kelley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David E. Kelley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Public

Will this series ever be put on Blu Ray or DVD for devoted fans of the show. I loved this show and could watch it over and over and over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:1400:3E0:21D0:6361:6F82:38C2 (talk) 00:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:David_E._Kelley&oldid=1252185706"