Talk:Deodorant

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deodorant article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2

Non-use of deodorant

This article does not address people who do not use deodorant or the pressure put on them to use it. In many part of the world, people do not have it and yet they survive.

It is sometimes said that Listerine's main product was halitosis, that is they created the need for their product by making halitosis socially unacceptable. I believe that making non-use of deodorant socially unacceptable (despite otherwise good hygiene) has been the product of some deodorant manufacturer. Smelliness is now a sign of disease to most people even though this is inaccurate.

207.253.111.30 (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Venn diagram abuse

A subgroup of deodorants, antiperspirants, affect odor as well as prevent sweating by affecting sweat glands.

Many people mainly use antiperspirants to prevent visible shirt stains. For these users, antiperspirants function as their own primary group.

Addendum: Just for the record, B.O. is not such a big deal in rural, livestock environments. — MaxEnt 14:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Stick deodorant.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mum withdrawn – when and why?

From the introduction: The product was briefly withdrawn from the market in the US

This is pretty mysterious. When and why? If it was only brief, why mention it at all?

Same issue in the History section, which contains a similar statement. Omc (talk) 15:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History source

Cari Casteel https://arts-sciences.buffalo.edu/history/faculty/faculty-directory/casteel-cari.html has written about the history of deodorant. If anyone wants to improve this article, it might be worth looking up her work. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]