Jump to content

Talk:Diablo III

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Possibly incorrrect info

I think that act II is a little incorrect. I will replay Act II on my switch it make sure. In particular: Emperor Hakan II is a previous character from a lore. I thought Caldeum had an empress. Would you be okay if I change this? L10nM4st3r (1) (talk) 13:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, nevermind. It has beeen a while since I last played. It is emperor. Maybe I was thinking of "Emperor Hakan I" L10nM4st3r (1) (talk) 13:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Diablo III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Diablo III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About reception

In cases like this (Metacritic metascore 88 vs Users score 4.1), in which a game has very good reviews from official sites (which very often is part of the marketing), compared with general bad reviews from the users (also reflected on future sales and migration of the player base to the competition, like Path of Exile); shouldn't figure the Metacritic user note alongside official notes? Also maybe with an explanation about main gripes the community had about this game (like the real money auction house, the poor itemization, and the over simplification in gameplay). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antarte (talk • contribs) 21:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With the release of this video giving a very detailed and sourced review of the game's development, release, and reception, I feel like this original comment by Antarte has even more weight. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCRzuvwMDUs 2600:1700:4281:4100:0:0:0:32 (talk) 02:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. Also this comment is 4 years old. -- ferret (talk) 02:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Diablo_III&oldid=1206959953"