The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dwyka page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation
Not even a village
I don't think Dwyka is really big enough to be considered a village or even a hamlet. There is literally nothing there but the railway halt - satellite images show only a single building. The Trig Survey map and the SA Geo Names System regard it as merely a railway station and not a settlement. - htonl (talk) 09:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The German wiki article says it has a population of 100, but I don't know where they got that figure, and after checking the satellite maps I tend to agree with you. If it's only a railway halt, shouldn't we delete this article as non-notable?--eh bien mon prince (talk) 07:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The German article seems to be unsourced, and indeed I can't see where 100 people could be living anywhere in the vicinity. I will WP:PROD the article. - htonl (talk) 07:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
