Jump to content

Talk:E. C. Row Expressway/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • In mentioning the place names for the termini in the infobox, you use West Windsor, Ontario and City of Windsor/Town of Tecumseh. Can this be reformatted to be consistent?
    • The mention of the eastern terminus in the infobox needs to be cleaned up. I would fix it to read "Banwell Road on border of City of Windsor/Town of Tecumseh", linking the latter town.
    • "the E. C. Row" sounds colloquial, should refer to it as the E. C. Row Expressway.
    • It is commonly referred to by this name by local news sources, so I assume it is a common local nickname, possibly even official in some way. - Floydian τ ¢
    • You use "sandwiched" a lot in the route description. Can some of these instances be replaced with different words?
    • Only twice actually haha... but I changed one instance regardless. - Floydian τ ¢
    • Delinked the second instance that does this. No article for him, but it is a worthy candidate for one in the future. - Floydian τ ¢
    • I noticed Highway 2 is unlinked in the Route description and the first instance in the History while linked in the second instance in the History. I would link the route at the first point it is mentioned in the prose.
    • Removed link from history section as it's already linked in the lede. - Floydian τ ¢
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Can a source be added for the length in the infobox?
    • Citation needed for "The westernmost 3 kilometres (1.9 mi) of the expressway is undergoing reconstruction as part of the Herb Gray Parkway project, which will also result in construction of a new international crossing northwest of the intersection with Ojibway Parkway."
    • The sentence "No work has progressed on the extension since." needs a citation.
    • The entire future section is uncited; sources need to be added.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • Can some more historical information be added to the lead? Specifically when the expressway was built.
    • Do you have a kilometerpost for the Highway 401 junction?
    • Not that I can source at this time, though I know what it is. - Floydian τ ¢
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    A photo of the road would be nice, but not required.
    Hadn't checked for several years,
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will put the article on hold for fixes to be made. Dough4872 02:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay, just got the notice of this about 2 or 3 days ago. All fixes made. - Floydian τ ¢ 01:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is still one unsourced statement I pointed at above that needs to be addressed before I can pass this. Dough4872 01:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Thanks for the review :) - Floydian τ ¢ 03:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I will pass the article. Dough4872 03:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]