Talk:E. C. Row Expressway/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- In mentioning the place names for the termini in the infobox, you use West Windsor, Ontario and City of Windsor/Town of Tecumseh. Can this be reformatted to be consistent?
- The mention of the eastern terminus in the infobox needs to be cleaned up. I would fix it to read "Banwell Road on border of City of Windsor/Town of Tecumseh", linking the latter town.
- "the E. C. Row" sounds colloquial, should refer to it as the E. C. Row Expressway.
- You use "sandwiched" a lot in the route description. Can some of these instances be replaced with different words?
- The link Edward Charles Row needs to be fixed as it links to an unrelated person.
- I noticed Highway 2 is unlinked in the Route description and the first instance in the History while linked in the second instance in the History. I would link the route at the first point it is mentioned in the prose.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Can a source be added for the length in the infobox?
- Citation needed for "The westernmost 3 kilometres (1.9 mi) of the expressway is undergoing reconstruction as part of the Herb Gray Parkway project, which will also result in construction of a new international crossing northwest of the intersection with Ojibway Parkway."
- This statement is still unsourced. Dough4872 01:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- The sentence "No work has progressed on the extension since." needs a citation.
- The entire future section is uncited; sources need to be added.
- With recent completion of the Herb Grey Parkway alongside the E.C. Row, I have updated the History and Future Section and cited. - Floydian τ ¢ 01:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- A photo of the road would be nice, but not required.
- Hadn't checked for several years,
- A photo of the road would be nice, but not required.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I will put the article on hold for fixes to be made. Dough4872 02:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, just got the notice of this about 2 or 3 days ago. All fixes made. - Floydian τ ¢ 01:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- There is still one unsourced statement I pointed at above that needs to be addressed before I can pass this. Dough4872 01:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thanks for the review :) - Floydian τ ¢ 03:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- I will pass the article. Dough4872 03:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thanks for the review :) - Floydian τ ¢ 03:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- There is still one unsourced statement I pointed at above that needs to be addressed before I can pass this. Dough4872 01:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)