Jump to content

Talk:Eboracum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
 Eboracum covers content related to York Museums Trust. This organisation has participated in a GLAMwiki project. You may find interesting content related to the topic among their Archaeological collections of the Yorkshire Museum images or items or be find out more about them or from their staff at their GLAM Directory Page. They are keen to help through this and their participation in the global GLAMwiki Project


Humber

It's known to most people as a river and is called a river on the page. There's no need to add confusion. ---G.T.N. (talk) 15:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not it's a river, it doesn't need two links to Humber, one of them a redirect, within three lines. GuillaumeTell 17:32, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I just prefer to keep the wording that is actually seen how it is. ---G.T.N. (talk) 11:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a river, and there's no need to link it repeatedly. Modest Genius talk 23:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upsides down column

"A re-erected Roman column now stands, upside down, on nearby Deangate" Is there a reference for this "upside down" assertion? It's a commonplace in York & therefore on the net, but the head of education at the Minster recently said it was incorrect. Salvianus (talk) 16:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

The etymology through 'yew' is extremely dubious, and probably given that efrog (lower case 'e') in modern Welsh means 'the place of hogweed' (hogweed = efwr), nothing at all to do with yews (ywen, pl. yw). In modern Breton, hogweed is evor and yew (sing.) is ivinenn [1]. I suggest the page should be reviewed and amended accordingly. Gwyddno (talk15:46, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to Rivert, Albert Lionel Frederick (1979), The place-names of Roman Britain, Batsford, p. 357, ISBN 0713420774, Eboracum may derive from eburo-, the British for yew (making Eboracum the "place of yews, place abounding in yews"), or the personal name Eburos (known in Gaul) and the British -ac-, meaning "estate of" (making Eboracum "estate of Eburos"). In Rivet's words "We have no way of knowing which meaning is right, though Jackson (Britannia, I (1970), 73–74) regards the first as preferable, because the formation signifying "estate of" was rare in Britain." It looks like the English Heritage book used to source the etymology of the name in the Wikipedia article has come down on the side of the yew derivation, and I don't see a problem with using that as a source. Nev1 (talk) 17:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.logosdictionary.org/

COI ?

I've been developing this page a bit over the last few days, but I just want to clarify my position in terms of COI. I work for a museum in Yorkshire and have access to viable paper resources to help expand this page exponentially - we have a Wikimedian in residence here (user:PatHadley as a point of cotnact) but I do not want to be seen as being a biased source. I would like opinions as to whether I should continue to expand the page for the benefit of WikiProject: Archaeology and WikiProject: Yorkshire or simply advise on potential references and additional material here on talk page. I can certainly advise on the topic in general. Comments please. Zakhx150 (talk) 13:28, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, WP:COI doesn't stop you from editing, please continue to do so, your efforts are appreciated. Dougweller (talk) 15:41, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, your help expanding the article will be very much appreciated.--Cúchullain t/c 16:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you folks. I shall wait a week or so and then proceed with alacrity. Zakhx150 (talk) 15:08, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ad

This article was edited as part of an edit-a-thon

This article was edited as part of the York Museums Trust Edit-a-Thon

The editor who attended the event may be a new editor. In an effort to support new editors, please assume good faith to their contributions before making changes. Thank you! Zakhx150 (talk) 11:33, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Eboracum/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires infobox
  2. Lead needs expanding to summarise article
  3. Requires copy-edit for WP:MOS
Keith D 22:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eboracum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eboracum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How is it stressed in Latin?

Is it pronounced as "Ebóracum" or "Eborácum" in Latin? Where is the stress? --M. Humeniuk (talk) 06:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eboracum&oldid=1196353641"