Jump to content

Talk:Electro-hydraulic actuator

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Electro-hydrostatic actuators EHAs are not the latest technology

EHAs are not the latest technology

C. W. Helsley, Jr., "Power By Wire for Aircraft - the All-Electric Airplane", SAE, #771006, February 1977this shows the hydraulics have been eliminated and a new section or connection to linear actuator should be made. Electro-hydrostatic actuators (EHAs)are not the latest technology

Wdl1961 (talk) 01:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


quote ""mechanical servo-power package (MSPP) to these functions will meet the power and frequency response requirements, and will save additional weight. The MSPP consists of an electric motor, an adapter gearbox, a flywheel, a mechanical controller, and a mechanical hinge. ""


Wdl1961 (talk) 01:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hydraulic vs. Hydrostatic

Why is the title of the article "Electro-hydraulic actuator" when it describes only what an "Electro-hydrostatic actuator" is?

I'm pretty sure that hydraulic and hydrostatic are not synonyms. Shouldn't we change the article name and, more importantly, write a paragraph explaining the difference between electro-hydraulic actuators and electro-hydrostatic actuators? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.13.28.133 (talk) 20:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hydraulic commonly is a synonym for hydrostatic. Also I'm unaware of any hydrokinetic counter-examples to this. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:05, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The first post in entirely correct, and the second post wrong. There are fundamental differences between hydraulic and hydrostatic actuator technologies. The entire article requires re-writing. The following links would be very helpful:
Electrohydraulic_servo_valve
https://www.moog.com/products/actuators-servoactuators/actuation-technologies/electrohydrostatic.html
https://www.hydraulicspneumatics.com/cylinders-actuators/electrohydrostatic-actuation-energy-efficient-option
https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=Awr9Dt.6m5VdQcwAdHZXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTByNDZ0aWFxBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwM2BHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzcg--/RV=2/RE=1570114618/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fpdfs.semanticscholar.org%2f4efa%2f883f7af8d08acb314ba6e5dbc7af8f9ec476.pdf/RK=2/RS=zZFN.u2bnPQImif_NakQLQy4kKc-
https://web.archive.org/web/20080517035145/http://www.yf.com/actuation_electrohydrostatic.cfm
200.68.142.20 (talk) 07:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC) baden k.[reply]

Response time of EHAs

I suggest adding details about the response time of the actuators and the systems that use them.

Also, it might be good to link to a description of the technology used in the actuators. Pneurd (talk) 12:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stepper motors?

Why does this article claim, "The primary development that lead to the possibility of EHAs was the precision feedback controlled conventional motor, or high-power stepper motor." I know of no use for stepper motors here, nor how they'd even be used. The purpose of an electro-hydraulic system (the topic of this article) is that a relatively simple electric motor provides the power, the precision comes from hydraulic valves. There's just no need for an electrical positioning system such as a stepper, torque motor or similar. Nor does the cited reference support this. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:04, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]