Talk:Expedition 21

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Speculation on Crew Roster

I'm all for linking into the crew members' names as soon as possible, but isn't posting a "Potential" crew edging a little towards Original Research? UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 13:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference for crews through Expedition 26 added. Ariel♥Gold 22:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Stott

Anyone know why she is being taken back early and not allowed to return on the Soyuz? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.182.253 (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it is because of delays in other rotations and the way the manifest is playing out. Plus the Russians want to send one more tourist to the station. So instead of sending up that Soyuz up with 2, they will send 3, bring Stott back on the shuttle and the next Soyuz launches will all have 3. I am not sure, but I believe the is what is going on.--Navy blue84 (talk) 16:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Start Date

Cross referencing the Soyuz TMA-16 article I think this began on 30 September, not October. Otherwise the chronology is confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daudajos (talk • contribs) 23:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]