Talk:Filth and Wisdom

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Madonna Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Madonna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Madonna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MadonnaWikipedia:WikiProject MadonnaTemplate:WikiProject MadonnaMadonna
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Review

Didn't this film receive consistently awful reviews? Should they be mentioned? Kate e kate e (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

. yes, the film was panned but Madonna fans are Wikipedia vandals so this page should be locked as I've entered the film reviews in twice and seen them removed by whiny madonna bots. Catherine Hubescher (User talk: Catherine Huebscher) 06:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As there are 2 positive reviews on the actual wiki page then it was not panned but received mixed reviews Voodoorocksteady —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.113.167 (talk) 05:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it fair to call it a "widely panned" film? Rotten Tomatoes shows three reviews, and all three are positive. Glamking —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:54, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello two years ago. More reviews for the film have come in since. It's much more negative now. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Filth and Wisdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081018163911/http://www.ifc.com/film/film-news/2008/10/eugene-hutz-on-filth-and-wisdo.php to http://www.ifc.com/film/film-news/2008/10/eugene-hutz-on-filth-and-wisdo.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Filth and Wisdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120123035631/http://www.secrets-clubs.co.uk/explore-secrets/filmtv-venue-hire-at-secrets/ to http://www.secrets-clubs.co.uk/explore-secrets/filmtv-venue-hire-at-secrets

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]