Jump to content

Talk:Iroh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Former good article nomineeIroh was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 28, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
March 31, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Article restored

This article has improved in terms of sources since its nomination for deletion. The reason why it was nominated for deletion is because of its lack of notability in outside sources. Please see the article as it appeared in January 2015 and compare it with its current iteration. There is a noticeable difference. G. Capo (talk) 19:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

G. Capo I don't have a preference so I'm going to abstain from the discussion. When I removed the content here and here I was combating some highly questionable editing from InternetSpartan, whose sole contributions appear to involve serial reversions. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Diff showing the "noticable difference" that G. Capo refers to. It seems to consist mostly of the addition of a (well-sourced) section on how the character was received in real life. I would suggest that anyone thinking of turning it back into a re-direct instead take it to a new AFD as the addition of a real-world discussion of the character is enough of an improvement to possibly make a difference; however I'd still prefer to see bigger changes in the rest of the article. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iroh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]