Talk:Japanese destroyer Momi (1944)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Will review soon. Hog Farm _Talk 03:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

• Rohwer is listed as a source but not used
• Article gives the name meaning as "fir tree", but Nevitt has "white fir"? It appears to be practically the same to my non-Japanese reading eyes, but maybe better to go with the exact translation in case there's some sort of different connotation with that?
• Recommend a second ref to support the nature of Ikutagawa Maru as an ex-Italian reefer
• "despite the presence of a nearby Allied convoy headed towards Lingayen Gulf. The two destroyers were spotted by American aircraft as heading directly for their convoy, so the Ikutagawa Maru may have already separated herself from her escorts by this time, and the three ships comprising the convoy's escort attempted to intercept them" - not in Nevitt. Maybe a misplaced reference?
• Looks like maybe the page range for O'Hara should be 288-290 (barely hanging over onto that third page)?

I think that's it from me. Hog Farm _Talk

Thanks for looking this over. See if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Still not seeing where we have supported "The two destroyers were spotted by American aircraft as heading directly for their convoy", although I may be missing it. Hog Farm _Talk 22:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Finally found it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.