Talk:Japanese destroyer Natsuzuki/GA1
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Stable?
yes Cos (X + Z) 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Image review
The only image is in public domain and is relevant Cos (X + Z) 23:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio?
Earwig show a 2.9% so there is no copyvio Cos (X + Z) 23:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Grammer
@Sturmvogel 66: I have some things I want you to do under this section. Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Lead/Lede
Mid-year the destroyer was turned over to Great Britain and was scrapped in early 1948.
add a comma after "Mid-year".
Design and description
- all good
Construction and career
One of the second batch of Akizuki-class destroyers authorized in the 1941 Rapid Naval Armaments Program,
add "Being" to the start of the sentence and replace "batch" with "batches".- Being is fine, but batches doesn't work.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
MOS
Lead/lede
Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Layout
Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Words to watch
Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
WP:SHIP guidelines
Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Source check
- all citations are styled well
- all citations are reliable
- meets wp:or
Has major aspects and is focused?
yes Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
NPOV?
yes Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. See if my corrections are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes they are Cos (X + Z) 15:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)