Jump to content

Talk:Jason Goldberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Comment

When was he born? Does anybody have data regarding that?

Boy or girl?

This is an odd situation...two secondary sources indicate the couple have welcomed a "baby girl", but the name given sounds quite masculine. I'm going to change the text of the article to read "second child" and leave the name in place, that way we won't be going round and round with the "it's a boy/it's a girl" insanity. --Alan (talk) 14:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources clearly say it's a girl. There's no reason to assume the sources got it wrong, but leaving it ambiguous is fine with me I guess. --OnoremDil 14:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Outside a Johnny Cash song, I've never come across such a clear cross-gender naming. Are we going to agree with the sources and say a child named Jagger Joseph is female? My gut says it's a big-time error on the part of their editors...which is why I'm looking for a third source that can corroborate the first two. --Alan (talk) 14:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed your hidden note suggesting the source is wrong, but I won't edit war over it if it returns. It's an unusual name, but if there aren't any sources that suggest that it's wrong, there's no reason to assume it is. --OnoremDil 14:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a source that quotes Frye as saying "She is very calm. We call her our little Buddha baby" (emphasis mine)
Do a google search for "Jagger Joseph Blue Goldberg" and you'll find a bunch more...though clearly not all would qualify as reliable sources. --OnoremDil 14:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. --Alan (talk) 14:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jason Goldberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]