Talk:John Oliver Memorial Sewer Plant/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

Link phosphorus

Background

Environmental need

Link Danbury, Connecticut
to upgrade their waste treatment facilities to remove 98 percent Any way to rephrase to limit repetition of the "to" preposition?

John Oliver

I don't think the link on "tangential diatribe" is what you think it is; it links to a speech disorder
Commas around while airing a segment on jury selection in the United States
Link YouTube

Sewage plant

Building

Sentence construction makes it hard to tell who or what, exactly, set a price of $102 million
No comma after "Regional Water Pollution Control Authority"

Cost

Good

Functions

Link The News-Times

References

Good

General comments

Images are properly licensed and relevant
No stability concerns in the revision history
Copyvio score looks good

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — Ghost River 00:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver: thanks so much for the speedy review! I think I got it all :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making those changes on your end! I made one small change per MOS:NUMERAL, which specifies that numbers should not be mixed numeric/spelled out in the same sentence, and I think this looks good to go! — Ghost River 16:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver: awesome! thank you so much again! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 16:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]