Talk:Korea

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Korea article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 6 months

Korea was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 17, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 24, 2004, August 22, 2005, and August 22, 2006.

This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Korea Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Asia Top‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Pritzker Military Library Mid‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Addition

I think the December 1991 agreement between the two Koreas should be listed in the Establishment section of the infobox because it is an important document of Korea to establish the foundation of relations between the two Koreas. Perhaps we also need to mention this document in the main section of the article. https://ko.wikisource.org/wiki/%EB%82%A8%EB%B6%81%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%9D%98_%ED%99%94%ED%95%B4%EC%99%80_%EB%B6%88%EA%B0%80%EC%B9%A8_%EB%B0%8F_%EA%B5%90%EB%A5%98%C2%B7%ED%98%91%EB%A0%A5%EC%97%90_%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C_%ED%95%A9%EC%9D%98%EC%84%9C Newwikinguser (talk) 09:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this document is more important than the Panmunjom Declaration. Newwikinguser (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter if you personally assign more importance to one event over another. What matters is do reliable sources also argue that the event you are advocating for is notable. Yue🌙 23:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I find a reliable source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1991/12/13/two-koreas-pledge-to-end-aggression/d104ab96-1a85-4024-8b61-bf9e43d779eb/ Newwikinguser (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also this: https://2001-2009.state.gov/t/ac/rls/or/2004/31012.htm Newwikinguser (talk) 12:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And this: https://www.nytimes.com/1991/12/13/world/koreas-sign-pact-renouncing-force-in-a-step-to-unity.html Newwikinguser (talk) 12:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those sources merely attest to the agreements existence, but where does it say that any of them that in retrospect it is a historically important event, more important than other attempts at peace and unification from then till now? You made an argument and you have yet to provide a reliable source that backs up your argument, leading me to believe that it is a personal opinion of yours. I also find it suspicious that when one specific detail, which has been repeatedly added by sockpuppets of a blocked user, was removed, your account was created not even a day later advocating a similar but alternate detail be added in its place. Yue🌙 03:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 September 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the second paragraph of the Prehistory subsection of the History section of the “Korea” page…

Change “The linguistic homeland of Proto-Koreans is located somewhere in Southern Siberia/Manchuria, such the Liao river area or the Amur region.”

…to…

“The linguistic homeland of Proto-Koreans is located somewhere in Southern Siberia/Manchuria, such as the Liao river area or the Amur region.”

…by adding “as” before “the Liao river”. The Return of Baba (talk) 01:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yue🌙 02:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]