Talk:Language lab

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Education Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Listing vendor names

Wikipedia is not a free advertising space. Companies offering language labs should only be mentioned in this article if they play (or have played) a significant role, and in that case independent sources should be cited which demonstrate their importance. Regards, HaeB (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking for a balanced and informative view of language labs at present but I don't think the article has got to this stage yet. It still reads as if it's written by a supplier. Chrisemms (talk) 19:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tone, and sources

This article lacks sources aside from the introductory paragraph, and that is just for one fact. Also, the way this article is written seems to be from a one-person point of view, plagiarized, or straight out of someone's essay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thiefxray (talk • contribs) 01:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have to agree on that. Much of the information in the paragraph on "Problems" is contradicted in the 2004 Paper by Roby that is cited above. The information seems to make sense to me, but I would love to see where it comes from... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.143.114.202 (talk) 22:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Language lab mahiti

L.l 103.141.52.222 (talk) 10:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]