The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
I reverted the edit that added the following information to the article: "He now owns a brewing company in lakeside, Montana called tamarack brewing company Ale house and Grill." This information is false, Lanny McDonald is the not the owner of this business as the edit implied. The buisness is owned by Josh and Andra Townsley. Andra, being McDonalds daughter. [1], [2] are a couple of articles found that clearly state the owners of the business. This also shows proof that the second to last edit was also incorrect, as the edit changed the name of his daughter from Andra to Andrea, when clearly the name is Andra and shouldn't have been changed. Cmr08 (talk) 00:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"His giant, walrus style moustache is McDonald's most defining characteristic" needs to be changed to "His giant, walrus style moustache is McDonald's most defining physical characteristic" since you previously mentioned personality trait characteristics.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What's "consistent" about a citation style that italicises the title of an article when it's from, for example, CNN/Sports Illustrated, but not a similar article from the Calgary Herald?
If you mean the infobox birthplace, what's the point of this ridiculously convoluted code?
Chained links, piped abbreviations where no abbreviation is needed, and an unnecessary link to Canada (per WP:OVERLINK). How does this benefit the reader who just want to know where the player comes from?
On your first question, you will have to take that up at Template talk:Citation, as the differences in italicization are built into the template. Regardless, mixed citation formats are discouraged. Changing some to the cite x format while the rest are in the citation format is not a desired thing, and I would appreciate it if you didn't do this. Resolute22:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that the difference is caused by the presence or absence of the 'work' parameter. If, for example, a cite were to be coded as work=Hockey Canada website rather than publisher=Hockey Canada, the the title would appear unitalicised, consistent with other similar citations. In another example, publisher=CNN/Sports Illustrated would be better as work=Sports Illustrated, omitting CNN entirely, since knowing the owner/publisher of SI has no value to anyone checking the citation. Colonies Chris (talk) 10:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Written publications, such as books and newspapers are italicized. Websites are not. This is something that has consistently been done through many FA and GA nominations, and is consistent with the examples on the citation template itself. Resolute16:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and since I missed part of your comment... CNN/Sports Illustrated (or CNN/SI) was not the same as Sports Illustrated. CNN/SI was a formal web partnership between CNN and Sports Illustrated. Though there may be merit to that change in this case, as the entire website has been rebranded to focus on SI, rather than both together. Resolute17:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
On the second, the separate links to town, province/state, country in the infobox is an internal project standard, and is used on thousands of articles. If you wish to propose a change there, please bring it up at WT:HOCKEY to discuss changing for all articles, not just this one. Thanks, Resolute22:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can see that this silly format is widely used in hockey player articles, but I can find no evidence in WP:HOCKEY that it's a 'standard'; can you give me a link to where this was discussed/agreed? Colonies Chris (talk) 09:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Couldn't tell you off hand, but that is immaterial. You are aware that this is the established standard as it is pretty much universally used. If you wish to change it, the burden to establish consensus is yours. I am not necessarily opposed to making a change, but I am opposed to doing it in a one-off fashion. I encourage you to open a discussion at WT:HOCKEY. Thanks, Resolute16:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am not aware of any that are properly licensed and which we could use. This is, unfortunately, an ongoing challenge with players (people, really) from the 1950s up to the advent of digital photography. Resolute20:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Made it incredibly cheap and easy to produce good quality images. The number of people who took their cameras to games in the 35mm photography era was far lower than today. That makes it harder to find images from that period of time that are licensed properly for our use. Resolute18:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]