Talk:List of Mongol rulers

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mongols: Mongol Empire High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mongol Empire task force.

Untitled

Is the birthdate for Genghis Khan correct?

That is not his birthdate, but rather the date at which Temüjin was acknowledged as the Genghis Khan, or "Universal Ruler"[1]. Regarding his actual birthdate, though, there is no concrete source. Scholars tend to cite 1162, but 1155 and 1167 have also been asserted[2]. There seems to be a lack of first-hand evidence. Milkfoam 03:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mamai was never khan of Golden Horde in Russia. He was de facto. So I removed his name from the list.

Mongol Empire

The Mongol empire was split as early as 1260s, but why is Yuan classified in the empire while Northern Yuan is not? It seems very illogical. It's much better to separate them. Also, the khans of the western khanates are NOT "Great Khans of the Mongol Empire" as the title claims.--Choulin (talk) 01:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mongol rulers

I removed some earlier sections added without discussion by User:Kirhk, such as Xiongnu and Khitans. These are not commonly considered to be Mongols, even though some of them may be considered Proto-Mongols. --Cartakes (talk) 00:20, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Book

Why is that book advertised, complete with ISBN so prominently. A reference at the bottom should be enough. The cover design doesn't add anything to the article, nor is the description explaining anything particular about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.183.26.161 (talk) 06:58, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]