Talk:List of newspapers in Chile
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dailies or weeklies and monthlies
This list may include only daily newspapers, because of the periodicity of that, and because Diego Grez added monthlies and weeklies only for the O'Higgins Region, making it an incomplete and biased list. --Sfs90 (talk) 04:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- It should include other publications. I have not had time to edit this article more, as you could see, I am revamping it with tables describing editors, owners, foundation, and other information. If you wish to help me out revamping this article, desiring that it later becomes a featured list (and featured on the main page), you are welcome. I like the idea that it includes weeklies and monthlies, it will make it a more complete list. Yes, we could separate them by periodicity, but simply relegating this article to dailies is an incorrect idea in my opinion. --Diego Grez (talk) 13:58, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Also, O'Higgins is not the only region that includes newspapers that are not dailies. El Líder is a weekly (the Melipilla edition). --Diego Grez (talk) 14:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
There are other newspaper lists that include weeklies and monthlies. List of newspapers in Massachusetts, List of newspapers in Canada, List of newspapers in Turkey, List of newspapers in Greece, List of newspapers in the United Kingdom, etc. We should take these as examples. --Diego Grez (talk) 14:09, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Well, in that case you should difference between "dailies", "weeklies", "monthlies", etc. Mixing newspapers with different periodicities makes the list confusing and giving wrong information. And if you are too encouraged to include the newspapers, separate the list, making subsections according to the periodicity, and be sure to add all the newspapers published in Chile (not the only ones published in your city). Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 18:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Since you are the one who disagrees with the current appearance of this article, be bold and do it yourself --Diego Grez (talk) 19:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Why is this article 'citing' a source which fails to mention the supposed publications listed?
The section on the O'Higgins Region appears to 'cite' a document (a primary source which appears neither to establish notability nor to state that the websites named in it are in fact online newspapers) [1] for supposed publications which aren't even referred to in it. What exactly is this source being cited for? AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Apparently it's an attempt to justify the Wiki existence of e.g. User:Diego Grez' private website El Marino. Right now the user is conducting an edit war to promote this website, which is a blatant example of conflict of interest. Ferrotomb (talk) 21:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think we can take that as read - DG has a history of creating articles etc which conveniently include himself. The fact is though that not only is El Marino not named in the source, but neither are the other supposed online publications. Making the notability of the list (or at least, the online regional part) rather questionable. Wikipedia is not a directory, and even if these websites were actually named in the (primary) source cited, inclusion would require further evidence on notability (i.e. sources actually discussing them individually in depth, rather than merely verifying their existence). Without any source at all, they simply don't belong. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- I was visited upon with a {{uw-3rr}} by DG for removing the wikilink to his personal website. By the way, DG is currently promoting his website on several other projects. Isn't there a way to stop this? Ferrotomb (talk) 22:53, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Each project is autonomous - and they may have different standards regarding COI editiing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- I was visited upon with a {{uw-3rr}} by DG for removing the wikilink to his personal website. By the way, DG is currently promoting his website on several other projects. Isn't there a way to stop this? Ferrotomb (talk) 22:53, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of newspapers in Chile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150215045423/http://www.lanelibraries.org/unionindex.htm to http://www.lanelibraries.org/unionindex.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
others
Should this not include La Nación? And how about DiarioChile? Deipnosophista (talk) 11:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of newspapers in Chile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821001312/http://fondodemedios.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/PLANILLA-PUBLICACI%C3%93N-PROYECTOS-ADMISIBLES-MAS-RECONSIDERADOS-FONDO-DE-MEDIOS-2014-A-PUBLICAR-21.pdf to http://fondodemedios.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/PLANILLA-PUBLICACI%C3%93N-PROYECTOS-ADMISIBLES-MAS-RECONSIDERADOS-FONDO-DE-MEDIOS-2014-A-PUBLICAR-21.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821005523/http://fondodemedios.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/PLANILLA-PUBLICACI%C3%93N-PROYECTOS-ADMISIBLES-FONDO-DE-MEDIOS-2014_final2.pdf to http://fondodemedios.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/PLANILLA-PUBLICACI%C3%93N-PROYECTOS-ADMISIBLES-FONDO-DE-MEDIOS-2014_final2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)