Jump to content

Talk:Literary consonance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Things That Were Removed

  • cadences are supposed to be more consonant that the chords which immediately preceded it. Dissonance has a disturbing quality which leads to musical dynamism and a quest for resolution. This resolution is consonance.

Lady Matilda Rabbit removed the above text as it is non-neutral. Hyacinth 21:15, 4 Aug 2004

Sibilance

Sibilance redirects here. I'm not an audio engineer but I did just hear sibilance mentioned on the daily show. I think in the context of audio engineering it relates to the crackling you can get in an audio system on "s" and "sh" sounds. A google search reflects this. Should this page be forked or at least get a section on sibilance as it applies to the audio field? —Ben FrantzDale 01:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory statements

In the first paragraph, alliteration is considered a subset of consonance; in the third, alliteration is contrasted with consonance. --Dependent Variable, 17 July 2007

Logical boundaries between alliteration, assonance and consonance

I wondered if anyone can confirm or deny a statement which, if correct, might clarify the relationship between alliteration, assonance and consonance;

"All alliteration is a form of assonance or consonance, it is a form of assonance where words start with the same vowel sound and a form of consonance where words start with the same consonants."

Is that a correct statement and if so might the page benefit from its inclusion? Andrew F. (talk) 10:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell the statement is technically true. But the part "it is a form assonance where words start with the same vowel sound" is confusing to readers, and therefore I do not suggest your statement should be included as it is formulated now into the main article. --Spannerjam 19:56, 10 November 2013 (UTC)