Talk:Lordotus pulchrissimus

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

This article was created by the bot Qbugbot. For more information, see User:Qbugbot/info. For questions and comments, leave a message at User:Qbugbot/talk.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rebeccaspell. Peer reviewers: Mmhua, Steelwull, Nikhilaggarwal123.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Behavioral Ecology Peer Review

Nice job on the article! Overall, it was solid with detailed descriptions and good citing. I added an image of rabbitbrush to the article so readers can visualize what the diet/host plant of this fly is. I made minor grammatical changes so that plural nouns and verbs matched. I also changed some sentence structures to make them flow better. I also edited the latin nomenclature so that the species name "pulchissimus" is now lowercase. There was some ambiguity with what you were referring to with "it" and "they," in one or two sentences, so I added a few words for clarity. There are also now several more links, like for rabbitbrush, since many people may not know what that is. I also placed the "Home Range and Territoriality" section in front of the "Food Resources" section to fit the suggested article formatting. --Mmhua (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I think your article has a lot of good information, and where sources may be lacking in specific information about this species, you have good comparisons with other flies to make up for it. I changed the capitalization of section headers–generally only the first word should be capitalized. Additionally, there was some speculation ("this suggests that..." "...this is likely because...") which is difficult to put in a Wikipedia article because it can be seen as subjective information. Overall I changed the tone a little to be more neutral, since the writing was a little prose-y in some sections. The information you have is great though!! Steelwull (talk) 04:08, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, I think this article is really well written already and has ample information on the fly. I think the previous edits that were done by the other peer reviewers were spot on and added to the flow of the article. I decided to add another image of rabbitbush near the mutualism section just for better visualization and also reworded the section about female fur color change in the "female appearance" section. Finally, I added a couple of sentences about male aggregation. Great article and great read! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikhilaggarwal123 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article is beautifully crafted and organized in a very strategic and comprehensive manner! The research performed by the author is well detailed and encompasses a wide variety of research areas. To complement your work, I have added on supplemental research to the "Distribution" and "Aggregation of Males" paragraphs, and have cited reputable sources to the research. Well done!Rchiou (talk) 01:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a nice job with this article. It's well organized and sections are broken up with subheadings and text to make it easier to follow. I edited some grammar and added wiki links to things I think would be helpful to a reader less familiar with biology. I think your female description is a little confusing however. The description of the coat changing colors could be more straightforward, but overall you've done a good job! Montana.sievert (talk) 01:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]