Jump to content

Talk:Lux (soap)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 February 2021 and 21 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Teague Sloane. Peer reviewers: Tygodin17, Aliroc065.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

what is the name of lux's organisation?

lux is a commercial product.

It's stated in the very first paragraph. Lux is produced by Unilever. Best regards, TheBaron0530 (talk) 12:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC)theBaron0530[reply]


What has Lux done as a company outside of existing and selling soap? This article doesn't seem to provide much valuable information, and the only references are to Unilever articles which is the parent company of Lux. 66.67.23.84 (talk) 23:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tag these articles upon consensus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 14:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image Image:LuxBlue34.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lux (soap). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

How is the article a personal opinion? Drscar18 (talk) 17:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]