Talk:Mind (charity)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mind (charity) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

excessive see also links seem a little weasely to me, does there really need to be so many links to Scientology? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.92.119.217 (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mind media award

We should probably write a section for the annual award they give out

List of past winners http://www.mind.org.uk/news-campaigns/mind-media-awards/looking-back-at-the-mind-media-awards/

this years http://www.mind.org.uk/news-campaigns/mind-media-awards/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam Dufus (talk • contribs) 00:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Explain your edits and reverts, please

An editor reverted a proposed update without an explanation so I reverted the revert. If you would, please explain why you are reverting other editor's updates so that everyone who watches pages can determine if there is a legitimate reason or not for you to remove proposed updates. Thanks! Damotclese (talk) 16:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Someone once again altered the test without explaining the reasons why. Please use this Talk: page to discuss proposed changes, otherwise other editors will revert your changes. Thanks. Damotclese (talk) 16:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was a recent edit by a user who had been adding almost identical changes indiscriminately to multiple articles. . . Mean as custard (talk) 16:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you claiming that the text is promotion? Would you please stop making changes without explaining yourself? That is not how we do things on Wikipedia normally. Editors should note why they are making changes so that other editors do not consieder it unwarranted vandalism. Damotclese (talk) 16:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not claiming anything; the original edit added nothing significant to the article and I just felt the article was better without it. I removed an almost-identical paragraph from about 20 other articles; feel free to reinstate those edits if you think the articles would thus be improved . . Mean as custard (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When you make changes, (talk) you need to describe why you are making them. This article has a history of vandalism which is why a large number of editors watchlist it. You have a history of making unexplained changes, I see your talk page has informed you of why it is necessary to explain your edits to avoid being reverted as vandalism. As (talk) noted, we don't get paid for our time here and when you waste people's time, they get less inclined to improve Wiki pages. Hopefully that's the end of your behavior. BiologistBabe (talk) 16:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BB, where have you ben? :) Not to worry, I get tired of incompetence but it's not going to drive me off, I watch too many pages associated with the ANF and the Scientology criminal enterprise to revert vandalism to avoid working on pages. And yeah, this page has a history of politically-motivated vandalism, I was asked by the RFC bot years ago to resolve one such argument and for some reason I never unwatched the page. I'm going to unwatch it now. Thanks! Damotclese (talk) 16:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All is now becoming clear; I will refrain from editing any pages relating to mental health from now on. Once bitten, twice shy. . . Mean as custard (talk) 17:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mind (charity). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100216080342/http://www.mindincroydon.org.uk/DocumentStore/AnnualReport0809.pdf to http://www.mindincroydon.org.uk/DocumentStore/AnnualReport0809.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be helpful to expand the section on Local Mind Charities?

Would it be helpful to expand the section on Local Mind Charities (into its own section) to talk about the federated structure, the Mind Quality Mark assessment/audit, and local services? Or would it be useful just to cover the federation and affiliation process/fee and then information about the local minds be added as new articles and linked through? uksigma (talk) 07:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]