The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lacrosse, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of lacrosse on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LacrosseWikipedia:WikiProject LacrosseTemplate:WikiProject Lacrosselacrosse
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
I hope my deletion of the stub tag and other tags was not inappropriate. I tried hard to substantially beef up this entry and explain a rather complicated situation as clearly as I could. Precisely because this situation currently is so complicated, I'd argue for now to leave this as a separate entry, rather than combine it with College lacrosse. But of course, I'm anxious to hear what others think about that and also if they think I'm made this entry as clear as it can be under the circumstances.
Honestly, since I can editorialize here, this situation seems screwy at best, since clearly some of these NAIA schools have found a funny loophole to exploit and the MCLA and WDIA seem unsure how to respond so far. EmjayMiller (talk) 22:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work on the article, I haven't looked at it in awhile but it looks much better and less stuby. I agree that it should be left a separate article and not merged into the club section of college lacrosse. Not to editorialize either, but this situation also happens with other sports that the NAIA does not sponsor championships for. NAIA varsity programs are then forced to play in the club organizations. Bhockey10 (talk) 01:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
