Talk:Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 3

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 July 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to List of Naruto video games.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (2 participants)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (1 participant)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Region-Specific Costumes

SaiyanIsland has a list of which costumes are available where, but Wikipedia's blacklisted it so I can't provide the exact link. The Article is titled "ANBU Itachi Confirmed Europe DLC." 207.216.212.199 (talk) 22:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The page Naruto Shippuden:Ultimate Ninja Storm 3 Full Burst could be merged into this one. The Watchtower (talk) 16:37, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. You should wp:be bold and merge the articles yourself. This is an obvious case, as the WP:NVG says that expansions should not have separate article unless an extensive coverage is proved. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:37, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Mr X 01:43, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]