Talk:Navajo Nation Zoological and Botanical Park/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

For "tall" images, use "upright" instead of a specific width. (fixed)
Still need to put in state even though 'Navajo Nation' is used, as a lot of people (including myself) won't know where in the US Navajo Nation is, even though most people will have heard of it (but even that can't be presumed).
- ??? it says Window Rock, Arizona. Or what do you mean by "state"? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Maybe move the state's name, like this: Window Rock, Navajo Nation (Arizona), United States... will that be clearer? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - I had to modify the text to include Arizona. You're proposal above is also fine. Arsenikk ^(talk) 08:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Funding lacks reference. For this sort of things, the official site will be more than fine. (fixed Donlammers (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Convert acres to hectares, not sq km. (fixed) (additional instance fixed Donlammers (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Second paragraph of "Exhibits and mission" need refs.
- Good point. That was left in from the old stub. I'll try to find something; if not I'll remove it. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - It seems any references to the vegetation have disappeared... or maybe the person who started the stub just mad it up. Removed. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - FYI I found this: http://wikimapia.org/6620831/Navajo-Nation-Zoological-and-Botanical-Park. This contains identical text, so obviously one copied the other (though I can't tell which direction) and we can't use it as a source. I spent a bit of time yesterday as well, and can't find references to plants -- strange for a "Zoo and Botanical Garden."

The article uses a slightly informal language sometimes, such as "welcomes" and "in this spirit". I made some copyedits to try to make it more encyclopedic. (fixed)

Most enjoyable article. I came over some small issues which I fixed most, some GA-criteria-relevant, some perhaps not. What remains are two places where references are needed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One thing I forgot: three of the links in the refs to the official site are now dead. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC) (fixed Donlammers (talk) 01:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

It seems these have been fixed. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 08:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]