Talk:No call, no show

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 March 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was delete.

All complaints, but no solutions

This stub is pretty alarmingly written. The voice is a weird cross between that of a Human Resources specialist and someone who was sleeping during junior high school English class. Is this phrase really widely understood in the general parlance? That's what I came to try to find out, but I'm not thrilled about the prospect of trusting this author.

I agree, this does seem to take the POV approach that it is inconsiderate. Perhaps wording it as "Most employers would consider this inconsiderate" would be better? Also there is not a very thorough list of reasons for a no call no show. The part I take most issue with is where it says something like "sometimes the employee is quitting, though doing so inconsiderately." The intention is not necessarily to be insonsiderate, I would think more often than not it is that they are avoiding the awkwardness of quitting and have anxiety over it. If I had a job I hated I would quit pretty vocally I believe, but if it is just a job I do not need anymore and my abrupt absence would not severely harm production then I might just no call no show. Mwv2 (talk) 18:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

19 March 2014 AfD

I've restored the article with additional citations please review before any renomination. This is a specific type of unexcused absence that is a major issue in the workforce. Please contact me for any needed improvements. Cheers! Valoem ^talk ^contrib 13:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]