Jump to content

Talk:Noh Alam Shah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Name

Since Noh Alam Shah is Malay, "Alam Shah" is not a surname but a patronym (i.e., his father's name). Shouldn't he be referred to throughout the article as "Noh" rather than as "Alam Shah"? — Cheers, JackLee talk 08:51, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Playing Style?

Bullish and enthusiastic, Alam Shah's playing style is characterised by physical strength, pace, ability in the air, and opportunistic finishing. With his swashbuckling style and never-say-die commitment upfront, he is a firm favourite with fans, despite his volatile temper that got the better of him numerous times. Is there a need to describe this? Even much more famous well known players in Barclay Premier League weren't praised in anyway of their playing styles. Example Theo Walcott is not even praised for his sprints. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsdsasds (talkcontribs) 11:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

moved here from article.

feel free to edit and update to article if needed

Bullish and enthusiastic, Alam Shah's playing style is characterised by physical strength, pace, ability in the air, and opportunistic finishing. With his swashbuckling style and never-say-die commitment upfront, he is a firm favourite with fans, despite his volatile temper that got the better of him numerous times.

Alam Shah attributes his temper to an unhappy childhood. In a 2006 interview with The New Paper, he revealed that he was involved in gangs in his youth.

Alam Shah's nickname of "Along" means "Big Brother" in Malay – a reference to his astute leadership. It also means loan shark in Chinese.

Xaiver0510 (talk) 15:22, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noh+Alamsyah.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Noh+Alamsyah.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Noh+Alamsyah.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Noh Alam Shah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]