Talk:Oklahoma City Police Department

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misconduct section

Does anyone have information on the two officers charged with a drive-by shooting in 2010? I can find cites that they were charged, but I refuse to include it unless they were convicted. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 11:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Due weight for misconduct section

I've gone through the misconduct section and filled in the references. A couple appear to be too trivial to bother mentioning, but those with substantial sources are now easier to verify. The story about the officer accidentally shooting another officer when aiming at a charging dog is far too vague and the story is an uncredited brief, so that can go. The story about the officer killing someone in a crash while speeding without his siren is sad, but probably needs more substantial sources, since it's not clear from the single source how this significantly reflects on the department as a whole. The rest appear to be well sourced, and in most cases additional sources could easily be found, if needed. Grayfell (talk) 00:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]