Talk:Operation Ladbroke/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 06:58, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First impression

Well-written article. No major issues.

Lead

Good lead – informative, summarises article. No action required.

Background

No action required.

Planing

No action required.

Images, references and external links

Please add alt text to images.

It's not a requirement for GA or even FA

Add years of publication next to author's last name eg. Warren 1955, p. 21.

Done

"London~~, United Kingdom~~: Kimber." no need to mention the UK, as London is well-known. If you insist, shorten it to UK.

Done Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

End note

I find the article very informative and well-written. I find it really hard to find any flaws and mistakes. Very confident this article will be promoted to FA status. I'll be there for the FAC. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 07:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]