Talk:Outlook.com
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Outlook.com article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other talk page banners | |||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Outlook.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100523080259/http://windowslivepreview.com:80/hotmail/new/ to http://windowslivepreview.com/hotmail/new
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Reversion Codename Lisa
I'm not sure why this was reverted, it has nothing to do with Outlook on the web. Besides the fact that Outlook.com is not renamed to Outlook on the web, but that Outlook on the web came to Outlook.com WikIan -(talk) 22:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Metro is no longer used
The article should be edited to reflect that Microsoft's UI is no longer called Metro. It was changed in 2012 because of trademark infringement to Metro AG
Instead it is called "Modern Design" or more simply "Modern" https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/stories/design/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.212.199.34 (talk) 18:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Should the name be changed?
It seems Outlook is the name used by Microsoft and not Outlook.com. It is further confusing that we have Microsoft Outlook (the software client part of 365/Office) and Outlook on the web which I have just put a move request on (see Talk:Outlook on the web).
Maybe this article should be called simply "Outlook" while the software article should be "Microsoft Outlook (software)"? And that third article moved to Exchange Online. Maybe that would clear up confusion and be more accurate too. 148.252.129.141 (talk) 17:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Internet articles
- Mid-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- Mid-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- C-Class Microsoft articles
- High-importance Microsoft articles
- WikiProject Microsoft articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report