Talk:Overjustification effect

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Overjustification effect article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Overjustification effect was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 27, 2012). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Motivation#Incentive theories: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation|intrinsic motivation]] The anchor (#Incentive theories: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Discussion

Reminds me of Tom Sawyer getting his friends to pay him for the privilege of painting his fence ! Only the other way round ... --195.137.93.171 05:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the meta-analyses and studies cited, it seems that the opening sentence of the article should explicitly state that the effect occurs when the external incentive is expected, whereas unexpected incentives have no such detrimental effect on intrinsic motivation. TroyandAbedintheMorning (talk) 21:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected incentives are, by definition, not incentives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.43.109.233 (talk) 14:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think a link to Cognitive evaluation theory wikipedia page would help the theory development, as well as expanding theory development to include a discussion of Self-determination theory, with a citation of an article such as Deci and Ryan's review of the theory. TroyandAbedintheMorning (talk) 16:29, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More applications to other domains, such as employment, would show the breadth of the overjustification effect. TroyandAbedintheMorning (talk) 18:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you comment on WP:MEDRS and give an expert review against the WP:GAN criteria? Your comments in many ways hurt this student in getting their GA passed and made the article more out of line because you were evaluating them against a criteria not related to Wikipedia? :( --LauraHale (talk) 09:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand exactly what you mean here. What does it mean to "give an expert review against the WP:GAN criteria"? I'd really like to improve this article properly, and I see how moving away from primary sources will be more in line with proper Wikipedia format, so any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated. TroyandAbedintheMorning (talk) 04:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why User:LauraHale cites the medical research policy WP:MEDRS, since the Overjustification_effect does not involve medical research.Robertekraut (talk) 20:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like the second paragraph of the Experimental Evidence section would better be suited for the Volunteering bullet point in the Applications section. Also, does anyone know where to find the papers mentioned in the RSA talk at [1] ? Those were apparently funded by the Fed and conducted by MIT, UChicago and CMU, and they seemed pretty relevant. Kangyuan (talk) 05:21, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you comment on WP:MEDRS and give an expert review against the WP:GAN criteria? Your comments in many ways hurt this student in getting their GA passed and made the article more out of line because you were evaluating them against a criteria not related to Wikipedia? :( --LauraHale (talk) 09:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Impact of recent student edits

This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course. As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.

If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article. Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work. If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further. If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.

Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:

0 -No unproductive work to clean up
1 - A few minutes of work needed
2 - Between a few minutes and half an hour of work needed
3 - Half an hour to an hour of work needed
4 - More than an hour of work needed

Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC) 71.196.78.46 (talk) 18:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source for Sports subsections of Applications section?

Is there a source for the claims made about Alex Rodriguez and other athletes in the Sports subsection of the Applications section? I assume there is, especially given the citations scattered throughout the rest of the article, but I just didn't see it anywhere in the article. Abagh0703 (talk) 20:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]