Talk:Petlyakov Pe-3

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Petlyakov Pe-3 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Petlyakov Pe-3 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 10, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
April 21, 2010	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 2, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 9th Bomber Regiment was tasked to lead groups of Soviet fighters and attack aircraft (over 2000 aircraft in total) to their targets during 1941 because their pilots could not navigate on their own?

Current status: Good article

Aviation: Aircraft / Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the Soviet aviation task force.

Military history: Aviation / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Russia: Technology & engineering / History / Military Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

GA review

I have begun (and ended) a GA review, which can be found here. It was an easy pass, with only a minor comment. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

promised CE of the article, plus some comments

Sturm, I promised I would look this over, and I apologize for the delay. I've made some minor tweaks (swapped subject/object, strengthened verbs, etc.) in the text. There are two parts that need clarification. What is a tactical bomber and why did the German bombing of Moscow convince the Soviets they needed one. I tweaked the lead a bit, to put some important info up front (i.e., this was WWII). We need to understand the bis after the number. What's that about? Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:54, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just happy that you found the time to get to it; don't worry about the delay. I've changed tactical bomber to high-speed bomber which should be a bit clearer to the ordinary reader and clarified that it was originally designed to be a night fighter. I also added a note about explaining the bis designation. I'm not sure that I like the one sentence lead paragraph, but we'll see how it flies. How does it read now?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not clear on the first sentence in the development. why did they need these aircraft. How does a high speed bomber protect a city being bombed? Auntieruth55 (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly speaking, it doesn't protect anything. But a night fighter derived from a high-speed bomber can at least try to do so.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]