Jump to content

Talk:Plankton and Karen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Secret Formula

There is a chance Plankton never had a chance to memorize the formula and simply read it only while making patties; so if the formula was taken away from him he wouldn't know how to make them. If this is true, than chances are the new episodes still take place after the movie. --Wack'd About Wiki 05:11, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming episode

I have a storyboard of an upcoming episode that explains the relationship of plankton and Mr. Krabs, but it's a 2 part episode and I only have part one. Also, the episode is still in production. Should I put something about that in?

  • "between friends" #NKAN051-501
    • It's an upcoming episode? How did you get this information? -AMK152 02:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm the nephew of Tom Kenny, and he took me to a recording session when I visited him. Yes, it is an upcoming episode.
Sorry we can only carry information on things that are already released, thanks for the offer though. Arniep 12:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if your telling the truth, but if the episode comes out, then i will believe you. -AMK152 00:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding article: When did Plankton disguise himself as Patrick?

Plankton's Familly spelling...

I replaced both fanas with Fannas...as this seems more grammatically correct... -CaptainG

Plankton's portrait...

NOT a good picture. The colors have been modified, and it seems sort of distorted. I'll get a new pciture. Abby724 17:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC) yeah i agree.user:no more jbl[reply]

Birthday

Pardon my ignorance, but where exactly does the knowledge about Plankton's birthday derive from? thank you --62.117.30.244 18:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was vandalism. -AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message) 00:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message) 20:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

The sources of this article are not cited.

Plankton's relative "Rainchild" was actually named Rainchild Jicky. -Someone

Fair use rationale for Image:SBPlankton.jpg

Image:SBPlankton.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Formal tone

Added the formal tag, the article does not seem to use a tone appropriate for Wikipedia. Words like "wiz" should not be used, at least in my opinion. LordBoreal51 23:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Cleanup

I have proposed a massive cutting down of the Spongebob series of articles at the WikiProject talk page. No one responded, and since silence equals consensus, I shall be performing my proposal soon. I am leaving this notice on every page that would be affected, as to make sure enough people would be informed. If you have anything to add, feel free to do so. sbfw | talk 03:55, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article looks kind of horrible...

Excuse me, but this article was sort of a trainwreck before I cleaed it up. I will list the was-issues:

It had no space between a statement about Plankton (which I have forgot) and the next sentence's first word, "He"

Twice it stayed that his full name was Dheldon Jim/J. Plankton Jr. where the initial "J" in "Jim” had a reliable source which was the episode stated, but no full "Jim" and "Jr." was never confirmed.

This, as the link states, counts as vandalism.

Sorry. --John Smith 21:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ObiwanLostToBarney (talk • contribs)

Karen

She has been in tons of episodes and almost every episode Plankton has been in and she gets 1 sentence? --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 15:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In case anyone was wondering, the history shows that this article was super short back in 2012, but it's been worked on a lot since then. Karen now has half of the page. 134.174.45.71 (talk) 13:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Plankton and Karen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Sheldon James Plankton" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sheldon James Plankton. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 10:59, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting in to two pages.

I think Sheldon Plankton and Karen Plankton should each have their own Wikipedia pages, since while they're often paired together, they're not always on the same page. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 03:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think so, they're so interconnected as characters that it makes sense they're a duo page. Also, most of the information is shared between them both (like their first episode debut, their critical reception, and their production history). It would be repetitive to have 2 pages, because you’d need to explain a lot about Karen on Plankton’s page anyway, and vice versa SBSPfan (talk) 02:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And it should be noted that in the movies, Karen doesn't get nearly as much focus as Plankton does. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 03:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But Mr. Krabs and his daughter Pearl each have their own pages. So how about we either split the page of Sheldon Plankton and Karen Plankton in two pages, or we put Eugene Krabs and Pearl Krabs into one page? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 03:45, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, they weren't that interconnected in the first episode they appeared in, and they're still not that interconnected all the time. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 19:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know this was a year ago, but I personally think that we should in fact split them into two pages. Thomasfan1000 (talk) 11:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Plankton_and_Karen&oldid=1207588712"