Jump to content

Talk:Ploiești

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Name

Can someone please explain to me why and when the city changed its name spelling Ploesti --> Ploiesti ? Thank you very much for any help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.81.28.145 (talk) 09:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Orthography

Wikipedia has no current standard on which orthography to use vis a vis the ș and ț characters. This article was using a combination of 'ş' and 's' instead of 'ș'. I have standardised on 'ș' except where doing so would break a link. - Francis Tyers · 07:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, Francis! Not only is this arbitrary (I note your "except where doing so would break a link"), but it breaks with consensus at a time when tens of thousands of articles with millions of "ş" (not "ș") characters exist out there, and when nobody uses "ș" on wiki or anywhere on the net. Dahn (talk) 14:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To Francis: I'm not sure what standard you're talking about, or how there could a single standard, because ş is a different letter from ș, and I'm sure there's languages out there that only use one and not the other. Seeing as Romanian uses ș, I think that's the one that should be replaced throughout the entire article.

To Dahn: Standardizing on ș is arbitrary? It's in the Romanian alphabet! Who cares how many other articles use "ş"? That does not have any bearing on which letter should be in this article. They are different letters; it's like suggesting that the English o should be replaced with ø because it's "tens of thousands of articles". rpop (talk) 18:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The railway arrived in...

According to this article the railway arrived in 1882 in Ploieşti. According to this site Ploieşti had its railway connection (with Bucharest and Galati) already in 1872. Rather enigmatic however is a phrase on Republic of Ploieşti: On the evening of 9 August [1870! Fvn], soldiers from Bucharest arrived at the Ploieşti train station. If that's correct, there must have been some railway even in 1870... Any specialists? Fransvannes (talk) 18:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Climate

I've added a climate table. I got the data from the URL below, but I don't know how to reference it properly. URL= http://www.weather.com/outlook/travel/businesstraveler/wxclimatology/monthly/ROXX0012 --IoanC (talk) 16:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sister cities

Someone keeps adding Tulsa to the sister city list. Neither Sister Cities International nor Tulsa Global Alliance list Ploesti in this quality. --71.153.137.46 (talk) 17:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the listing from both pages. Until someone can cite an authentic source documenting an official connection between the two cities, it should not be listed there. Xerius (talk) 21:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ploiesti bus 2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ploiesti bus 2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Ploiesti bus 2.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ploiesti

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ploiești. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ploiești&oldid=1209784124"