Talk:Preussen-class ironclad/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 10:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

shouldn't "German navy" be italicsed?
- No, it'd only be italicized if I used the German name (Kaiserliche Marine) - one wouldn't italicize US Navy either. Parsecboy (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"much faster" replace with "much more quickly"
- Substituted. Parsecboy (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment: GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

End note

I've very happy with this article – expertly-written, follows MoS, illustrated by good images, and the like. I hope this article can get the Star. If Parsecboy would like advice, please ask me. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 01:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]