Jump to content

Talk:Prior Park Landscape Garden

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Good articlePrior Park Landscape Garden has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starPrior Park Landscape Garden is part of the National Trust properties in Somerset series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 1, 2015Good article nomineeListed
December 6, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 11, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a park was established on the site of Prior Park Landscape Garden in 1100 AD by John of Tours?
Current status: Good article

Not much information here. Who owned it after Allen? When did the National Trust take over? Deipnosophista (talk) 22:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prior Park redirect

Should Prior Park really direct to this page, as Prior Park is the house and it's not really the same as the gardens! Abbyemery 12:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Four left

What are the four palladian bridges left? (1) Stowe (2) Prior Park (3) Tsarskoye Selo (4) .. ? Something tells me there might be more. NVO (talk) 19:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wilton House - see Wilton_House#The_gardens_and_grounds 86.147.160.133 (talk) 13:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Harry Patch photographed at the lake at Prior Park (Palladian Bridge in background) in 2007.

Probably not worth putting on the Prior Park page itself, but possibly of interest.86.147.160.133 (talk) 13:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some notes

I saw this was nominated for GA and I thought it should be noting that it is not home to one of four Palladian bridges, but to one of four in its specific style. Also the screen wall is known as Sham Bridge, a reference I believe to the nearby, somewhat related Sham Castle.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 08:22, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. The wikilink in both the lead and the section point to Palladian architecture so this is the architectural style - do you think it would be better to change the link to make it is clear it is the style which is being referred to? Re Sham Bridge: This source says "Thus the Sham Bridge at Prior Park is reminiscent of Kent's cascade at Chiswick House, or Venus' Vale at Rousham", but doesn't mention Sham Castle. My understanding is that Sham Castle was built for the view from Ralph Allen's Town House, Bath rather than Prior Park.— Rod talk 18:04, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is still correct to Palladian architecture so I don't see any problem there, and that I noted a somewhat relation between Sham Bridge and Sham Castle was just that they were Ralph Allen-coined "sham" follies, and wanted to note the name of Sham Bridge as it was not mentioned in the article. I'm certainly no expert on producing GAs but I just thought I'd help out.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 19:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've made some edits which I hope are in line with what you are thinking?— Rod talk 20:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well all looks good to me :) Good luck with the GA nomination. --TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 03:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Prior Park Landscape Garden/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 09:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Comments - nice piece of work.

Neat article, a few issues noted above, so I'll place it on hold for a bit. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"During 1737, at least 55,200 trees, mostly elm and Scots pine, were planted, along the sides and top of the valley. The valley floor remained as grassland and drainage water was channelled to form fish ponds at the bottom of the valley." needs referencing, then I think we're done. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All good, I'll pass to GA. If you could just tweak that ISBN so it's the "preferred" format, that'd be great. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Prior Park Landscape Garden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prior Park Landscape Garden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

National Trust pilot

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 18:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]